+4

Orphan Works Bill Should be Abandoned

Logo_form_crop380w

Valerie Atkisson / ArtBistro

April 29, 2008

If you are an artist, illustrator or designer of some sort you have probably received emails from your friends about a Orphan Works Bill. What is the big deal? Why is there so much hysteria around this?

Misnomer

Well, first of all it is a misnomer. The Bill titled the Orphan Works Act of 2008, evokes an emotional response – feeling sorry for a lost work of art. It would also make any work of art an”orphan work” that is not registered. The legislation actually destroys our current copyright law that protects photographers, Illustrator’s, graphic designer’s, and artists’ works against reproduction without permission or payment. Our current copyright law is a piece of legislation that is aligned with other international laws regarding copyright of visual work.

What is the problem?

The problem is that if a work of art’s owner cannot be found, the rights cannot be bought or permission granted to use in in print or film. Unless, of course it is in the Public Domain. The law currently makes it difficult for the images orphaned works to be reproduced. Instead of creating a body that tries to track down the creator and ultimately rules works as orphaned, like is done in Canada, the US Congress is proposing two bills that would drastically effect our current copyright law. One is in the house and one is in the Senate. The end result of these bills as they are currently written would make it very time consuming and expensive for artists to protect their work which is protected as is in the current law. Further more, The 2008 bills are better than the 2006 billnat protecting an artist if their copyright has been violated but still puts the burden on the “little man” to fight Goliath like companies such as Google, Microsoft and others who are in favor of the legislation.

How can I find out more?

I have listed here three web sites that will be helpful. On all of these sites you can download copies of the Bills that were just introduced to the Senate and House of Representatives last week. They are reworked Bills that were defeated in 2006. They are very similar but have differences too. Read for yourself.

Orphanworks.net claims an unbiased view of the Bill. On this site you look at transcripts of the testimonies to Congress on the 2006 Bill. It lists organizations that supported the Bill in 2006. A condensed history of the Bill is provided and brief bullet pointed issues

Popular Links

illustratorspartnership.org is the largest group of artists opposing the Orphan Works Act of 2008. The most enlightening item is an interview with Brad Holland, a leader in the Illustrator’s Partnership about on the effects of this bill on artists, illustrators and designers. This site has a resource page for visual artists that will give you an artist’s perspective on the pending legislation.

ASMP.org has changed its position on the Bill for 2008 and thinks that it may be able to support the changes. The changes are outlined very clearly there as are an explanation of they support and changes they support to the bills.

What can I do?

You can write your local congress representatives by fax, email and letter opposing this legislation. Find out how to contact them here: http://www.usa.gov/Contact/Elected.shtml

and/or you can join the Illustrator’s Partnership mailing list for updates on the fight against the Bill and soon to drafted letters opposing the legislation. To do this email illustratorspartnership@cnymail.com and place “Add Name” in the subject line, and provide your name and the email address you want used in the message area.

Some organizations say that this Bill is to be fast tracked before the end of this Congress Session others do not think it will come before this session or will simply not pass as many bills are never made into laws.

ArtBistro will keep you updated as to how these pieces of legislation are fairing and what you can do to voice your opinion.


+4
  • Photo_user_blank_big

    Trancefarmer

    4 days ago

    79 comments

    Helpful and succinct. I make no claim as to the reliability of the information. The author left links to encourage indepedent fact-checking. Could this be the start of a trend?
  • Jhbarts_max50

    jhaber31

    14 days ago

    283 comments

    Nathan's in effect correcting BikerGirl's congressman reminds me of "The Onion" headline back when, in which Congress approves arts funding by mistake.
  • Blurredinthehut_max50

    Animus

    15 days ago

    11 comments

    I don't want to feel like i'm writing a useless comment but I just woke up and am really sick, and the idea of this contradiction to what art is makes me feel sicker than I am.
  • Personanongrata_max50

    nathangriffith

    15 days ago

    137 comments

    Actually, there are two different bills in the house and the senate. And the last hearing in the house on their version was last month.
  • Test_max50

    bikergirl

    16 days ago

    8 comments

    I wrote my Congressman about this the end of last month or the beginning of this one and he said the Bill died last session.
  • Jhbarts_max50

    jhaber31

    16 days ago

    283 comments

    Nathan's comment rings true to me after looking at the provisions in the links Valerie gives, although it's worth insisting on the most palatable version of the law. While it seems burdensome to require any form of registration, it's hard to have work out there where it can be stolen and not have it fall under some kind of protection. If it's online, the person who finds it can't claim they couldn't find it just by Googling. I'll keep reading up, but definitely want to keep calm.
  • Personanongrata_max50

    nathangriffith

    16 days ago

    137 comments

    See my posts in the forum. http://www.artbistro.com/topics/3675-your-art-is-not-yours---change-in-usa-copyright-law-/posts The concept of Orphan works has existed in law for a very long time. These new bills are designed to better clarify both artist and user rights. The notion of due diligence in a search for a creator is far more stringent than those opposed to the bill let on. Yes, a creator might lose the right to seek certain types of damages, but the rate of compensation is based upon the licensing fee you yourself would charge for the same use of the work if they come to you or else, if they get this image from an archive or stock agency, it would be based upon price book rates for the same usage. In other words, you would receive the same amount you would earn i the worked was actually sold by you or your sales agent. There are several means by which to protect your work from "orphan" status. Register it with the copyright office (you can bulk register images). Embed your identity into the IPTC of every image you produce digitally. Join ARS or VAGA in the US who will act as copyright agent on your behalf. Build yourself a web site which is solely about your work and for extra protection, egister that site with Google and Yahoo (both free). All of these place and more would need to be checked by a potential end user in a due diligence search for a creator.

What's the Scoop?

Post a link to something interesting from another site, or submit your own original writing for the ArtBistro community to read.

Report News Here

Recent Activity

Dsc00269_max30
cigarettes_reds rated jimifer's photo: "Take Back the Night" 4 stars, 4 minutes ago.
Louis_xiv_max30
KAHH commented on lillyharms's photo, 5 minutes ago.
Louis_xiv_max30
KAHH rated lillyharms's photo 5 stars, 6 minutes ago.
Louis_xiv_max30
KAHH commented on lillyharms's photo: "Me", 6 minutes ago.
Mug_shot_rev_max30
blakkwolfe commented on artknechtion's photo: "Rainbow Girl 2008", 6 minutes ago.
Img_0561_max30
paco2frank joined the group "Nature/Scenic Photography Lovers", 7 minutes ago.
Louis_xiv_max30
KAHH rated lillyharms's photo: "Me" 5 stars, 7 minutes ago.
Louis_xiv_max30
KAHH commented on lillyharms's photo: "Me, dressing up", 8 minutes ago.
Louis_xiv_max30
KAHH rated lillyharms's photo: "Me, dressing up" 4 stars, 8 minutes ago.
Mug_shot_rev_max30
blakkwolfe rated artknechtion's photo: "Rainbow Girl 2008" 5 stars, 9 minutes ago.